🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."